Skip to Main Content

*Effective Health Science Searching: Primary vs Secondary vs Tertiary

Effective Health Science Searching

Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources

Introduction

Understanding the distinctions between primary, secondary and tertiary sources is critical for academic research. 

  • Primary sources provide original, firsthand accounts and are essential for foundational research.

  • Secondary sources analyze and interpret primary data, offering deeper insights and multiple perspectives.

  • Tertiary sources, such as encyclopedias and handbooks, summarize and condense information from primary and secondary sources, providing quick insights and background knowledge.

Recognizing these differences helps researchers choose the right source for their needs.

Comparison table

  Primary Secondary Tertiary
Peer Reviewed Yes No No
New Information and analysis Always Always Never
Purpose Original, firsthand accounts without interpretation by other researchers Its essential for understanding the foundational aspects of any research topic. Provides analysis, interpretation, or commentary on primary sources
It is essential to gain a deeper understanding of complex topics by presenting various perspectives, critiques, and summaries of existing research
Summaries of primary and secondary source to introduce the current state of research on a topic, summarize or condense information
It is helpful to for gaining quick insights or background knowledge
Types of studies
  • Pilot/prospective studies
  • Cohort studies
  • Survey research
  • Case studies
  • Lab notebooks
  • Clinical trials and randomized clinical trials/RCTs
  • Dissertations
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Meta-analysis
  • Patient education material
  • Qualitative synthesis
  • Reviews of literature
  • Systematic reviews
  • Literature Review
  • Reference books
  • Encyclopedias
  • Handbooks
Methods Typically meticulously outline experimental designs, data collection methods, and statistical analyses. They often document the precise procedures followed, such as recruitment strategies for participants, intervention protocols, or diagnostic criteria used. Typically, describe the careful process they used to find as many results as possible, including what databases they searched, what keywords they used, and what the inclusion and exclusion criteria were for any articles analyzed in the study. No standard methods
Examples Pet-Keeping in Relation to Asthma, Rhinitis, and Eczema Symptoms Among Adolescents in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Study The relationship of domestic pet ownership with the risk of childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Can You Own a Pet If You Have Allergic Asthma? Risks and Tips

Test yourself

The passages below were taken from the methods section of either primary or secondary sources.

The bolded passages are key characteristics that indicate whether they are primary or secondary sources.

Read the passage, paying attention to the bolded parts. Then, determine what type of source it is.

Articles are all published in Frontiers, which is an open-access journal where all articles have a CC-BY license.

Next step

Take a look at the other categories and types of sources, or move on to research tools. 


Credit Statement: The information on this page was reused and adapted (with permission) from The University of Manchester Library My Learning Essentials. 

Material is licensed for reuse under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC